The big question! This question really points to awareness. Since every form (including thought, sensation, emotion, perspective, etc...) is proof-positive that there is an awareness there being aware of it, the question is pointing to why is awareness here.
Why is this awareness here? This real dream of nonexistence existing (which isn't really experienced as being embodied) is only possible due to this awareness (which is none other than the real dream itself). This awareness was never born and therefore will forever be. Your question really refers to "What's forever for?" This question arises out the foreverness itself. It shows that the only thing that can know (awareness) is unknowing even to itself.
Awareness asks and there is no other to answer, the question just fades back into itself as if the question never existed.
The forever space of awareness is like a blackhole, nothing escapes it, every existing thing gets sucked into it without any sign of it existing, as if it never existed. Nothing escapes the blackhole except the blackhole itself. There is nothing else but the blackhole and the blackhole cannot suck itself up into itself.
So awareness spites out the birth of a question about itself and then the question dies right back into awareness, as if it never existed. What's left, the forever space of awareness.
Why does it do this? The question can't be answered because the one asking doesn't even know why it is asking. The one (awareness) asking knows that the question is unanswerable. The knowing one (awareness) knows the question is unknowable.
The conclusion is that the answer is the question itself. When the question and the answer are the same exact one, both are seen as the one that they are and both are seen as irrelevant because without the question there is no answer and without the answer the question makes no sense. Isn't that weird that you have to have two concepts (question and answer) in order to make one concept make sense? It's like you need one to point to the other, yet take away one and both fail to exist because there are not two things there. They are not independent from each other. They are one movement, one unfolding, they both arise together and twoness is seen by the mind where oneness actually stands.
Therefore the question answers itself with the question. The question doesn't need an answer because the question is not separate from the answer. The question itself is not a question, it is the answer. Trying to answer the question with an answer is a misunderstanding, thinking that the question is separate from the answer. Both question and answer fade upon themselves. The split is seen through. Both collapse into each other and dissolve each other as if they were never there and what remains is the one without a second.
